|
DIRECT CHOP FOR BROWN CATARACTS: THE “CORE” TECHNIQUE
(multiple
peripheral nucleotomies with central core enucleation)
Pre-requisites:
Apart from an
advanced experience with the direct chop technique, the
following are desirable pre-requisites:
-
High end phaco machine with
facility for burst mode, hyperpulse (cold phaco) and an
effective surge suppressor
-
Sharp tipped, cutting
chopper (Fig. 7)
-
Good OVD for chamber
maintenance and endothelial protection.
-
A mechanical bent of mind
with understanding of the behavior of lenticular fibres.

Fig 7
The outermost shell of the cataract is almost never black and
always choppable. Instead of holding the nucleus from the
centre, hold it near the CCC edge and initiate a small
peripheral nucleotomy with lateral separation. This is repeated
after about 20 to 30 degrees of nucleus rotation so that 10-12
such multiple peripheral nucleotomies are created. No attempt
must be made at this point to dislodge these small elements or
to extend the cracks posteriorly. Since the forces are applied
away from the centre:
-
The
nucleus does not rotate during the chop
-
It never
tilts
-
The
central core gets mechanically separated from the peripheral
nuclear fibres.
The number of peripheral nucleotomies required to achieve the
separation of the central core is directly proportional to the
size and hardness of the core.
Once the central loosening is achieved, the phaco needle is
buried face down into the central core and, with the aid of high
vacuum, it is brought up. The second hand can be used to
separate any remaining adhesions between the centre and
periphery. This ‘nucleolus’ can then be easily jackhammered with
the chopper against the phaco needle and easily emulsified
(Figs. 2,4,5,6). Once this is completed, majority of the
problems are over since:
-
Space is
created in the capsular bag which assists in future chops
and separations.
-
The
incomplete peripheral nucleotomies can now be completed
under direct visualization.
-
These
peripheral nuclear fragments thus created easily prolapse
anteriorly.
90 percent of the procedure is thus completed with one phaco
setting (high flow, high vacuum, hyperpulse or burst mode) and
the last few fragments are then with the step-down technique
(low vacuum and flow rate). This is to avoid damage to the
posterior capsule which is more exposed at this stage.
The preferred settings are :
1.
Vacuum : 250-350 mm
Hg. Working at high vacuum requires a particularly thick
(non-collapsible) tubing with efficient surge-suppressor
mechanisms in the machine
2.
Asp. Flow Rare :
26-40 ml/min
3.
Phaco Power : 10-50
% (foot controlled) . Burst mode and hyperpulse mode are both
desirable for this technique. The burst mode is useful for
embedding the needle into the nucleus and to release the
occlusion when a hard piece is impaled into the needle. The
pulse and/or hyperpulse are particularly useful for dealing with
the fragments with as little heat generation as possible.
Torsional phaco is also a good alternative to reduce heat
generation and repulsion.
It would not be out of place here to mention the qualities of a
good phaco needle:
-
Micro
needle: 0.9 mm
-
Flared or
miniflared tip: for better holding
-
30 degress:
for good trade-off between holding and cutting abilities
-
Kelman
bent: for efficient cutting
-
ABS
system: The small aspiration bypass hole in the shaft
minimizes surge with more emphasis on phaco-assisted
aspiration rather than actual emulsification. (Fig. 8)
|

Fig 8
|
|

Fig 9 |
The advantages of this technique are:
-
Predictability and reproducibility: The size of the central
core need not be titrated as the peripheral chops just bring
out this core, whatever be its size. The problem with
sculpting was finding out when it was enough.
-
Phaco
power: The average effective phaco time for even the hardest
nuclei is less than 20 seconds since minimal phaco power is
used to eat up the central core.
-
The chance
of would burn is minimal.
-
The
procedure is not dependant on the sharpness of the needle
since mechanical forces are used to break the nucleus rather
than ultrasound.
|